Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions with versus without type 2 diabetes mellitus
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Nowadays, due to advanced techniques and well-trained interventionists in catheter labs, new scientific research has shown percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to be a safe treatment procedure in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). However, no study has systematically compared PCI outcomes in CTO patients with versus without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, through this meta-analysis we aimed to systematically solve this issue. METHODS Between September 2016 and June 2017, the Cochrane Database of Randomized Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases were carefully searched for publications comparing PCI outcomes in CTO patients with versus without T2DM. Long-term (≥1 year) adverse clinical outcomes were considered the endpoints. Discontinuous data were analyzed by RevMan 5.3 whereby odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were the statistical parameters. RESULTS This analysis consisted of 1 randomized trial and 6 observational studies with a total number of 4571 patients with CTO (1915 patients with T2DM and 2656 patients without T2DM). Patients' enrollment was between the years 1998 and 2015.During this long-term follow-up (≥1 year), mortality was significantly higher in CTO patients with T2DM (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.31; P = .03, I = 0%). Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and repeated revascularization were also significantly higher in patients with T2DM (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.58; P = .01, I = 10%) and (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.59; P = .01, I = 36%) respectively. However, myocardial infarction was not significantly different (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.61-1.67; P = .96, I = 26%). CONCLUSION During this longer follow-up period post-PCI, mortality, MACEs and repeated revascularization in CTO patients with T2DM were significantly higher compared with similar patients without T2DM. Nevertheless, whether this hypothesis is relevant or not should be confirmed in larger trials.
منابع مشابه
بررسی نتایج کوتاه مدت Percutaneous Coronary Intervention در بیماران دیابتی و غیر دیابتی
Background: Despite recent improvement in coronary intervention, there are many controversies about it’s results in diabetic patients. The goal of this study is comparison of in hospital outcome of diabetics after coronary intervention with nondiabetics. Methods: In this study 115 diabetic and 115non diabetic patients who admitted for coronary intervention in our center during 1383;84 were en...
متن کاملDifferential clinical responses to everolimus-eluting and Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND Some (but not all) prior trials have reported differential outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents versus stents eluting rapamycin analogs according to the presence of diabetes mellitus. These studies lacked sufficient power to examine individual safety and efficacy end points. METHODS AND RESULTS To determine whether an interaction exists b...
متن کاملOutcome of Successful Versus Unsuccessful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Total Occlusions in One Year Follow-Up
BACKGROUND Chronic total occlusions (CTO) comprises already one-third of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). There is controversy in PCI results considering short-term and long-term outcomes. We aim to compare efficacy and outcome of successful versus unsuccessful PCI in CTO in 1 year follow-up. METHODS In this retrospective study we choose 330 consecutive patients undergone PCI on a ...
متن کاملComparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in the drug-eluting stent era.
OBJECTIVE Diabetes mellitus and chronic total occlusions are associated with unfavorable outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to assess the clinical and angiographic outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic patients who underwent successful percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions with drug-eluting stents. METHODS Baseline clinical and angiographic charac...
متن کاملClinical outcomes of treatment by percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing index revascularization in Ontario.
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data on the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention using contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease. METHODS AND RESULTS A population-based study was performed using the Cardiac Care Network, a provincial registry of all patients undergoing car...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 96 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017